Authority links — why posts cite them
Authority links are external URLs — to studies, official pages, reputable publications — that Structura cites from inside the posts it writes. Every campaign has a list of them. This page explains why they exist and how to curate yours.
Why posts cite authority sources
Two reasons, one for readers and one for search engines.
Readers trust posts that show their work. A fitness post that says “studies suggest eight hours of sleep” and links to a real study is more credible than one that makes the same claim in isolation. Citation is one of the clearest signals of a well-researched post.
Search engines treat linking out as a quality signal. Ranking algorithms look at whether a post is part of a wider web of trusted sources, or whether it’s an island. Posts that link to authoritative sites (and in turn get linked to themselves) tend to be trusted more. This isn’t trickery — it’s how the web’s been designed to work since Google started.
So every post Structura produces pulls from a curated list of sources for your niche and cites them naturally in the body.
How Structura picks them
During campaign creation, after the Keywords step, Structura runs the Authority step. It proposes sources based on:
- Your niche and campaign objective.
- Who tends to be cited by already-ranking posts for your keywords.
- Whether the source is reputable (established publications, official pages, research institutions) rather than thin content mills.
The list it proposes is a starting point. You know your field; you know which sources your audience actually trusts.
Reviewing the list
On the Authority step of campaign creation (or in Edit a campaign later), you see the list with each entry’s URL and the reason Structura chose it.
You have these controls:
- Delete (trash icon) — remove a source.
- Add source — paste a URL. Structura picks up the site’s name and records it.
- Re-discover — scrap the list and re-run the research with a different seed.
Click Looks good — continue when satisfied.
What makes a good authority source
Reputation. Industry-standard publications in your space. The New England Journal of Medicine for medical, the FT for finance, Smithsonian for cultural, etc.
Specificity. A page deep inside a reputable site beats a generic homepage. If the best cancer-research page on a site is a specific study landing page, use that URL, not the root domain.
Timeliness. Evergreen authority beats stale. For fast-moving topics, prefer pages that are obviously updated (e.g., “last updated 2026” stamps, ongoing blogs) over frozen press releases.
Diversity. A list that pulls from 8 different reputable sources produces more varied posts than one that always cites the same 2.
What to avoid
Competitors. Linking to a direct competitor’s blog post every time you publish doesn’t help you rank; it helps them. Pick sources that are adjacent or foundational, not ones competing with you.
Your own site. Authority sources are for external citation. For internal linking, Structura handles that separately based on your existing content.
Sites with questionable practices. If you wouldn’t be comfortable citing a source out loud in a meeting, don’t put it in the list.
Single-page sites. A blog with one flagship post isn’t a sustainable authority source — when that post goes stale, your campaign will keep citing it.
Does every post cite every source?
No. Each post draws from whichever sources are most relevant to its specific topic. A campaign with 10 authority sources on its list might cite 2–4 in any given post.
When to revise the list
- After your first few posts. Open a published post and see what sources were actually cited. If you don’t recognise them or don’t trust them, trim the list.
- When your niche shifts. New authoritative publications appear; old ones decline. A list built two years ago is likely stale.
- When a source becomes a liability. If a source you listed gets a credibility hit, remove it before your next scheduled post runs.